Are You Loving the Other Person or Your Story? The Neuroscience of Projection and Expectations
Introduction
Why do some people continue living inside our minds long after they are gone?
Why can physical distance sometimes feel emotionally overwhelming?
Why is it that a single unanswered message can trigger emotions far greater than the event itself?
Many people assume the answer lies in personality.
Some believe they are simply “too sensitive.”
Others conclude they have become overly attached.
Modern neuroscience tells a far more complex story.
Relationships are not experienced only through conscious thought.
They are processed by neural systems that evolved to help us survive, predict social interactions, and maintain emotional balance.
Long before we understand the meaning of love, friendship, or trust, our brain is already learning how relationships work.
Those early experiences leave traces that continue shaping how we perceive other people throughout life.
Understanding this process changes the way we interpret many of our emotional reactions.
Sometimes we are responding to what another person is actually doing.
But sometimes we are responding to the meaning our brain has constructed around that person.
Before We Learn About the World, We Learn About Relationships
The human brain is remarkably unfinished at birth.
Unlike many other mammals, a newborn enters the world with a nervous system that still requires years of development.
Much of that development occurs within relationships.
Before children understand language…
before they can explain their emotions…
before they consciously remember many of their experiences…
their nervous system is already learning something essential.
Is the world safe?
Can other people be trusted?
Will someone respond when I need help?
These questions are not answered intellectually.
They are answered through thousands of everyday interactions.
Being comforted.
Being seen.
Being soothed.
Being protected.
Being ignored.
Being frightened.
Being left uncertain.
Each interaction gradually shapes the brain’s expectations about human relationships.
This developmental process is known as attachment.
Although attachment is often associated with love, its primary biological function is something even more fundamental:
survival.
Attachment Is About More Than Love
Attachment is frequently misunderstood as a purely emotional bond.
In reality, attachment is one of the nervous system’s primary mechanisms for maintaining regulation.
During infancy, caregivers do far more than provide food and protection.
They help regulate physiological states that children cannot yet regulate independently.
Heart rate.
Stress responses.
Emotional activation.
Attention.
Sleep.
Even the developing stress-regulation systems of the brain.
Over time, these repeated interactions become internal models that influence how relationships are experienced throughout adulthood.
This is why attachment is not simply about affection.
It is about learning what safety feels like.
It is about discovering whether closeness brings comfort or uncertainty.
Whether vulnerability is met with care or unpredictability.
These early experiences gradually become part of the brain’s expectations about future relationships.
The Brain Learns Relationships Through Regulation
Attachment research has shown that significant relationships become integrated into the way the nervous system maintains balance.
People we deeply trust often become more than companions.
They become part of our biological regulation.
Their presence may help reduce physiological arousal.
Their voice may calm us.
Their reassurance may help organize emotional experience.
This process explains why meaningful relationships often feel physically comforting rather than merely emotionally pleasant.
Conversely, when an important attachment relationship is disrupted, the effects extend far beyond sadness.
The nervous system may experience increased physiological dysregulation.
Stress responses become more active.
Social pain intensifies.
Attention repeatedly returns to the lost relationship.
Some researchers describe the loss of an attachment figure as temporarily losing part of the system that helped maintain internal stability.
The brain is not simply grieving another person.
It is adapting to the absence of a source of biological regulation.
Oxytocin: More Than the “Love Hormone”
Few neurochemicals have received as much popular attention as oxytocin.
It is often called the love hormone.
While this description is not entirely wrong, it is far too simplistic.
Oxytocin participates in a broad network of processes involved in human social life.
Research has linked it to:
- attachment
- trust
- social bonding
- emotional recognition
- affiliative behaviour
- parental care
Rather than creating love by itself, oxytocin helps support the biological conditions that allow social connection to develop and strengthen.
As meaningful relationships deepen, they influence not only our thoughts and emotions.
They also affect the neurochemical systems that support human attachment.
This helps explain why certain relationships come to feel profoundly significant.
The brain does not simply remember these people.
It gradually incorporates them into the networks that regulate safety, connection, and emotional balance.
WATCH THE VIDEO:
English Subtitles Available – Activate CC.
Why Some People Continue Living Inside Our Minds
If meaningful relationships become integrated into the brain’s regulatory systems, another question naturally follows.
Why do some people remain psychologically present long after they have physically disappeared?
Why can the end of a relationship continue occupying attention for weeks…
months…
or even years?
Part of the answer lies in attachment.
But attachment alone does not explain everything.
Another powerful mechanism is constantly at work.
The brain does not passively observe reality.
It actively constructs it.
Every moment, it predicts.
Interprets.
Fills in missing information.
Generates expectations.
Creates meaning.
This remarkable ability allows us to navigate an incredibly complex social world.
It also explains why two people can experience exactly the same event while reaching completely different conclusions.
The relationship we experience is never built only from what another person does.
It is also shaped by the models our brain constructs to explain that person’s behaviour.
And this brings us to one of the most influential ideas in contemporary neuroscience:
Predictive Processing.
Understanding this theory reveals why we are sometimes not reacting to another person alone…
but to the story our own brain is continuously creating about them.
Are You Loving The Other Person or Your Story? – The Brain Does Not Simply Observe Reality
Most of us imagine perception as something relatively straightforward.
The world presents information.
Our senses collect it.
The brain interprets it.
Reality appears.
Modern neuroscience has profoundly changed this picture.
One of the most influential theories of the past two decades—Predictive Processing—proposes something very different.
The brain does not passively wait for information to arrive.
Instead, it continuously generates predictions about what it expects to perceive.
Incoming sensory information is then compared with those predictions.
Rather than building perception entirely from the outside in, the brain constantly combines external evidence with internally generated models.
In other words, perception is not simply received.
It is actively constructed.
This remarkable ability allows us to navigate an enormously complex world with incredible speed and efficiency.
Yet it also means that what we experience is never shaped by external reality alone.
Our expectations matter.
Our memories matter.
Our previous experiences matter.
And nowhere is this process more evident than in human relationships.
Are You Loving The Other Person or Your Story? – We Never See Another Person Completely Objectively
When we meet someone, we often assume we are responding directly to who they are.
In reality, our brain is doing something much more sophisticated.
It is continuously integrating multiple sources of information, including:
- previous experiences
- emotional memories
- beliefs
- learned relational patterns
- expectations
- present sensory information
The person standing in front of us is certainly real.
But the brain does not experience that person as raw reality.
It experiences an interpretation.
That interpretation is constantly updated as new information becomes available.
Most of the time this predictive system works remarkably well.
It allows us to understand intentions quickly.
Recognize familiar behaviours.
Anticipate social situations.
Respond efficiently.
Without prediction, everyday social life would become impossibly slow.
Yet prediction also has limitations.
Sometimes the brain fills gaps with assumptions that do not accurately reflect reality.
Projection: When the Brain Completes Missing Information
One of the most powerful expressions of predictive processing is what psychology commonly refers to as projection.
From a neuroscientific perspective, projection does not necessarily mean imagining something that is entirely false.
More often, it reflects the brain’s attempt to complete incomplete information using previous experience.
Consider a simple example.
Someone you care about does not reply to your message for several hours.
The observable facts are limited.
They have not responded.
Everything beyond that remains uncertain.
Yet the brain rarely tolerates uncertainty for long.
Almost immediately, possible explanations begin to emerge.
“They’re angry.”
“I must have done something wrong.”
“They’re losing interest.”
“They’re avoiding me.”
“Something has changed.”
None of these interpretations are contained in the original event.
They are predictions.
The brain is attempting to reduce uncertainty by constructing the most plausible explanation based on its previous learning.
The less information available…
the more room there is for prediction.
Ambiguity Gives the Predictive Brain More Work to Do
Relationships often contain incomplete information.
People become busy.
Messages are delayed.
Emotions remain unspoken.
Intentions are unclear.
The brain dislikes informational gaps.
Whenever important information is missing, predictive processes become increasingly active.
This helps explain why ambiguity often generates so much relational stress.
The uncertainty itself is uncomfortable.
But much of the distress comes from the brain’s continuous effort to explain what remains unknown.
Sometimes those explanations prove accurate.
Sometimes they do not.
The nervous system cannot always distinguish between a verified fact and a convincing prediction.
Especially when emotional significance is high.
The more important the relationship…
the stronger the brain’s motivation to complete the missing pieces.
Are You Loving The Other Person or Your Story? – Emotional Memory Shapes What We Expect to See
Predictions do not emerge randomly.
They are strongly influenced by previous experience.
If someone has repeatedly experienced rejection, abandonment, criticism, betrayal, or unpredictability, the brain gradually learns that these outcomes deserve particular attention.
This does not mean the person is inventing reality.
Nor does it mean every fear is justified.
Rather, the nervous system becomes more sensitive to cues associated with earlier experiences.
It detects them more quickly.
Interprets them more readily.
And often expects them with greater probability.
From an evolutionary perspective, this makes sense.
The brain is designed to learn from experience.
If a certain pattern repeatedly signaled danger in the past, becoming more responsive to that pattern may increase future survival.
However, in modern relationships, this adaptive learning can sometimes produce unnecessary suffering.
The nervous system may respond not only to what is happening now…
but also to what has happened before.
Are You Loving The Other Person or Your Story? – Confirmation Bias: Seeing What We Already Expect
Another process closely related to predictive processing is known as confirmation bias.
Human beings naturally tend to notice, interpret, and remember information that supports what they already believe.
Again, this is not a defect.
It reflects the brain’s preference for maintaining coherent internal models.
Suppose someone already believes:
“People eventually abandon me.”
Their attention may become especially sensitive to behaviours that appear consistent with that expectation.
Delayed replies.
Brief conversations.
Cancelled plans.
Moments of emotional distance.
Meanwhile, evidence pointing in the opposite direction may receive less attention.
Acts of care.
Consistency.
Support.
Affection.
The brain is not deliberately ignoring reality.
It is organizing information according to its existing predictive model.
Confirmation bias therefore strengthens the stories the brain already considers likely.
The more emotionally important the relationship…
the more powerful this process may become.
The Story We Build Can Become Larger Than the Event
Interestingly, many relational conflicts begin with relatively small events.
A delayed reply.
A different tone of voice.
A distracted facial expression.
A forgotten promise.
These events certainly matter.
But the emotional intensity that follows often depends less on the event itself than on the meaning assigned to it.
The observable reality may be relatively limited.
The explanatory story constructed by the predictive brain can become enormous.
Hours of mental rehearsal follow.
Alternative scenarios appear.
Hidden intentions are imagined.
Future consequences are anticipated.
Gradually, the brain begins responding not only to reality…
but also to the increasingly elaborate narrative it has created.
This is why two people can experience exactly the same situation while feeling completely different emotions.
They are not reacting to different facts.
They are reacting to different predictive models.
Are You Loving The Other Person or Your Story? – Reality and Interpretation Are Not the Same Thing
One of the most valuable insights offered by predictive neuroscience is that every relationship contains at least two layers.
The first consists of observable events.
What was actually said.
What actually happened.
What behaviour can genuinely be observed.
The second consists of interpretation.
The meaning assigned to those events.
The intentions inferred.
The expectations activated.
The memories awakened.
Both layers influence our emotional experience.
Yet they are not identical.
Learning to distinguish between them may be one of the most important skills in emotional regulation.
Because every time we confuse interpretation with reality…
our predictions begin shaping our experience more powerfully than the events themselves.
And that naturally leads to another fascinating question.
If expectations influence how we perceive relationships…
can they also influence how we behave within them?
Modern psychology and neuroscience suggest that the answer is yes.
And sometimes those expectations become powerful enough to change the very reality we feared in the first place.
Are You Loving The Other Person or Your Story? – When Expectations Begin to Shape Reality
Up to this point, we have explored how the brain predicts, interprets, and fills in missing information.
But predictive processing does not stop at perception.
Our expectations can also influence the way we behave.
And our behaviour may, in turn, influence how other people respond to us.
This creates one of the most fascinating dynamics in human relationships.
Sometimes we are not only predicting reality.
We are quietly participating in its construction.
Psychologists have long studied this phenomenon under the name self-fulfilling prophecy.
The basic idea is surprisingly simple.
A belief influences behaviour.
That behaviour changes the social interaction.
The interaction then produces an outcome that appears to confirm the original belief.
The prediction seems to come true.
Not because it was inevitably correct…
but because it influenced the course of events.
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Imagine someone who carries a deep expectation of being rejected.
Perhaps earlier relationships taught their nervous system that closeness often ends in disappointment.
Without realizing it, they may begin approaching new relationships differently.
They become more cautious.
More vigilant.
More sensitive to small signs of distance.
They may seek frequent reassurance.
Monitor changes in tone.
Withdraw emotionally to protect themselves.
Or become increasingly controlling in an attempt to reduce uncertainty.
The other person senses this tension.
They may begin feeling overwhelmed.
Pressured.
Misunderstood.
Eventually, they create more distance.
When that happens, the predictive brain immediately concludes:
“I knew this would happen.”
At first glance, it seems the original expectation was correct.
The reality, however, is more complex.
The outcome did not arise from one person’s expectations alone.
It emerged through the interaction of two nervous systems continuously influencing one another.
Relationships Are Dynamic Systems
Human relationships are never one-sided.
Every conversation involves two people interpreting, predicting, and responding simultaneously.
Each person’s behaviour becomes new information for the other’s predictive brain.
This creates an ongoing feedback loop.
One person’s fear may influence another person’s response.
That response becomes evidence supporting the original fear.
Both nervous systems adapt to one another.
Neither person is creating the entire interaction alone.
This is one reason relationships can become so difficult to understand.
They are not static events.
They are living systems.
Every behaviour influences the next.
Every expectation changes perception.
Every interpretation shapes future interaction.
The relationship becomes an evolving dialogue between two predictive brains.
We Meet Others Through Our Own History
One of the most important insights from attachment research is that we never enter relationships with an empty mind.
We carry our history with us.
Past experiences quietly shape present expectations.
Old memories influence current interpretations.
Previous relationships become templates for new ones.
This does not mean the past determines the future.
Nor does it mean every emotional reaction is simply a replay of childhood.
It means the brain uses previous experience as one of its most valuable sources of information when predicting what may happen next.
In this sense, we never meet another person completely “as they are.”
We also meet them through the relational models we already carry within us.
Our history becomes part of perception itself.
Wounds Can Shape Behaviour
Emotional wounds do not only change what we notice.
They can also influence how we behave.
Someone who expects abandonment may become emotionally distant before genuine intimacy develops.
Someone who fears betrayal may monitor every inconsistency.
Someone who has repeatedly experienced criticism may hesitate to express vulnerability.
These reactions are understandable.
They often represent adaptive strategies learned under different circumstances.
Yet in new relationships, those same protective strategies may unintentionally create the very difficulties they were designed to prevent.
The nervous system attempts to remain safe.
But safety achieved through constant vigilance often comes at the cost of genuine connection.
Recognizing this process is not about assigning blame.
It is about understanding how previous learning continues influencing present behaviour.
Awareness creates the possibility of responding differently.
But Not Everything Is Projection
At this point, an important clarification becomes essential.
Modern neuroscience and psychology do not suggest that everything we perceive is merely a projection of our own mind.
Sometimes another person’s behaviour is genuinely inconsistent.
Sometimes communication is objectively unclear.
Sometimes manipulation, hostility, deception, or emotional unavailability are real.
Reducing every relational difficulty to projection would oversimplify human experience.
Reality matters.
Relationships unfold within the real behaviour of real people.
The challenge lies in distinguishing between what belongs to external reality and what has been added by our own interpretation.
This distinction is central to mature relational awareness.
If you find this content useful, you can support it with a free donation.🙏
Lee Jussim and the Accuracy of Social Perception
For many years, psychological theories often emphasized biases, stereotypes, and cognitive distortions.
While these phenomena are real, social psychologist Lee Jussim argued that this perspective sometimes became one-sided.
His research suggests that people are often far more accurate in perceiving others than many earlier theories assumed.
Human perception is certainly influenced by expectations.
But it is not completely detached from reality.
People frequently recognize genuine behavioural patterns.
They often identify inconsistency accurately.
They may correctly perceive trustworthiness—or the absence of it.
In other words, not every intuition is a projection.
Not every concern is a cognitive distortion.
Sometimes we are perceiving something that genuinely exists.
The challenge is learning to distinguish between accurate perception and prediction-based interpretation.
That distinction requires curiosity rather than certainty.
Reality and Interpretation Dance Together
Relationships are not built solely from another person’s behaviour.
Nor are they built solely from our internal projections.
They emerge from the continuous interaction between:
- reality
- interpretation
- memory
- expectation
- present experience
Each contributes to the final experience we call a relationship.
Perhaps the most useful question is therefore not:
“Am I projecting?”
Nor:
“I know I’m completely right.”
A more helpful question might be:
“How much of what I am perceiving reflects observable reality… and how much reflects the story my brain is constructing?”
This question does not weaken our judgment.
It strengthens it.
Because it invites the brain to remain open to new information rather than becoming trapped inside its own predictions.
And that openness is precisely where neuroscience, mindfulness, and human experience begin to meet.
Mindfulness Creates Space Between Reality and Interpretation
Can mindfulness change the way we experience relationships?
Modern neuroscience suggests that it can.
Not because mindfulness changes other people.
Not because it guarantees healthier relationships.
And certainly not because it eliminates emotional pain.
Its greatest contribution may be something much simpler—and much more profound.
It helps us observe experience before automatically becoming identified with it.
The human brain continuously generates predictions.
Interpretations.
Explanations.
Stories.
Most of this happens outside conscious awareness.
Mindfulness does not stop the brain from predicting.
That is one of its natural functions.
Instead, mindfulness helps us recognize when prediction has quietly become certainty.
It reminds us that there is often a difference between what we know…
and what we imagine.
Facts and Interpretations Are Not the Same Thing
One of the most valuable skills cultivated through mindfulness is the ability to distinguish between different layers of experience.
We gradually learn to notice the difference between:
- facts and interpretations
- observations and assumptions
- behaviour and intention
- present experience and remembered experience
- reality and the stories our brain constructs to explain reality
This distinction may appear subtle.
In practice, it can transform the way we experience relationships.
Imagine receiving a brief message from someone you care about.
The observable fact might simply be:
“They wrote only one sentence.”
The mind may immediately add:
“They’re upset.”
“They’re losing interest.”
“I’ve done something wrong.”
“Something has changed.”
Mindfulness does not ask us to ignore these thoughts.
Instead, it invites us to notice them for what they are.
Interpretations.
Hypotheses.
Predictions.
Not verified facts.
That small shift creates psychological flexibility.
And flexibility allows the nervous system to relax.
Seeing More Clearly
Greater awareness does not mean becoming naïve.
Nor does it mean dismissing genuine warning signs.
Some relationships are truly inconsistent.
Some people are genuinely manipulative.
Some behaviours clearly communicate disrespect, hostility, or emotional unavailability.
Mindfulness does not require us to deny reality.
Quite the opposite.
It encourages us to observe reality more accurately.
Without immediately filling every uncertainty with assumption.
Without automatically interpreting every silence as rejection.
Without confusing expectation with evidence.
The goal is not to think positively.
The goal is to perceive more clearly.
Which Relationships Regulate Your Nervous System?
As our awareness grows, another important question naturally emerges.
Which relationships help regulate my nervous system?
And which consistently consume it?
Some relationships leave us feeling calmer.
More focused.
More authentic.
They increase psychological safety.
Support emotional regulation.
Reduce unnecessary vigilance.
Others leave us exhausted.
Preoccupied.
Hyper-alert.
Mentally occupied long after the interaction has ended.
Mindfulness allows us to observe these patterns without immediately judging ourselves or others.
Instead of asking only,
“Do I like this person?”
we may begin asking:
“What happens inside my nervous system when I am with them?”
This question often reveals far more than intellectual analysis alone.
Loving a Person or Loving a Story
Perhaps one of the deepest questions we can ask ourselves is the one that inspired this article:
Am I responding to the other person…
or to the story my brain has built about them?
Sometimes those two realities overlap remarkably well.
Sometimes they differ considerably.
Learning to recognize the difference is not a sign of emotional detachment.
It is a sign of growing relational maturity.
Healthy relationships do not require us to stop interpreting.
Interpretation is part of being human.
What changes is our willingness to remain curious.
To question our immediate conclusions.
To gather more information before becoming certain.
Curiosity allows prediction to remain flexible.
And flexibility is one of the nervous system’s greatest sources of resilience.
Conclusion
Every relationship is shaped by an ongoing dialogue between reality and interpretation.
The other person’s behaviour certainly matters.
But so do our memories.
Our attachment history.
Our expectations.
Our predictive models.
Our emotional learning.
The brain continuously weaves these elements together, constructing an experience that often feels completely objective.
Yet much of what we experience has already been filtered through previous learning.
Understanding this does not mean distrusting our perceptions.
Nor does it mean assuming that every difficulty is “just a projection.”
Reality continues to matter.
Our interpretations matter too.
Psychological growth begins when we learn to distinguish between them.
Instead of asking:
“Am I right?”
or
“Am I simply projecting?”
we might ask something far more useful:
“How much of what I am experiencing belongs to the present… and how much belongs to the story my brain has created to explain it?”
This question does not weaken our capacity to relate.
It strengthens it.
Because it creates space between automatic prediction and conscious awareness.
That space allows curiosity to replace certainty.
Observation to replace assumption.
Presence to replace endless mental rehearsal.
Mindfulness does not erase our history.
But it helps us see when history is quietly speaking through the present.
And perhaps that is where relational freedom truly begins.
Not when we finally change another person.
But when we learn to recognize the difference between the person standing before us…
and the story our brain has been telling about them.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is projection in psychology?
Projection refers to the tendency to interpret other people through our own expectations, emotions, beliefs, or previous experiences. From a neuroscientific perspective, projection can be understood as part of the brain’s predictive processes that help reduce uncertainty.
What is Predictive Processing?
Predictive Processing is a leading theory in neuroscience proposing that the brain continuously generates predictions about the world and updates those predictions using incoming sensory information. Rather than passively receiving reality, the brain actively constructs perception.
Why do I assume the worst in relationships?
Past experiences such as rejection, abandonment, criticism, or inconsistent caregiving can make the brain more sensitive to similar cues. This does not mean your perceptions are always wrong, but previous learning may influence how ambiguous situations are interpreted.
What is a self-fulfilling prophecy?
A self-fulfilling prophecy occurs when expectations influence behaviour in ways that increase the likelihood of producing the expected outcome. In relationships, fear of rejection, for example, may unintentionally alter behaviour and affect how others respond.
How does mindfulness improve relationships?
Mindfulness strengthens the ability to distinguish facts from interpretations, observe automatic predictions without immediately believing them, and respond with greater awareness rather than habitual emotional reactions. This supports emotional regulation, psychological flexibility, and healthier communication.
This is THE MINDFUL LAB
A space where Mindfulness, Neuroscience, Spirituality, and Human Experience merge to promote self-knowledge and personal growth.
If you found this article helpful, please like it, share it with someone you care about, subscribe to our newsletter, and explore our YouTube channel.
Suggested Internal Links:
-
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/07/17/what-kind-of-relationships-are-you-really-living/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/07/17/are-you-really-overreacting/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/07/17/why-chronic-stress-can-lead-to-inflammation/ https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/05/05/stress-and-the-immune-system/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/04/27/where-stress-comes-from-the-real-reasons-behind-your-discomfort/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/04/07/living-on-autopilot/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/03/30/thinking-about-the-past/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/03/24/how-to-calm-your-mind/
- https://www.tobejoyfultobesoul.com/2026/03/24/why-the-mind-never-stops-thinking/
Suggested External Scientific Sources
- PubMed
- National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Society for Social Neuroscience
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Greater Good Science Center (UC Berkeley)
SCIENTIFIC SOURCES & REFERENCES:
🔹 Sbarra DA, Hazan C. (2008)
Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308315702
🔹 Eilert DW, et al. (2023)
Attachment-Related Differences in Emotion Regulation in Adults
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10296607/
🔹 Vrtička P, Vuilleumier P. (2012)
Neuroscience of Human Social Interactions and Adult Attachment Style
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3398354/
🔹 LeRoy AS, et al. (2019)
Implications for Reward Processing in Differential Responses to Loss of a Close Relationship
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6896215/
🔹 Carter CS. (2014)
Oxytocin Pathways and the Evolution of Human Behavior
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24050183/
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110
🔹 Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. (2005)
Oxytocin Increases Trust in Humans
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15931222/
🔹Clark A. (2013)
Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
🔹 Nickerson RS. (1998)
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
🔹 Self-fulfilling Prophecy
Rosenthal R, Jacobson L. (1968)
Pygmalion in the Classroom
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322211
🔹Jussim L. (2017)
Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500062X
🔹 Shapiro SL, Carlson LE, Astin JA, Freedman B. (2006)
Mechanisms of Mindfulness
https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20237
🔹 Bishop SR, et al. (2004)
Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition
https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077
🔹 Lindsay EK, Creswell JD. (2017/2018)
Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5195874/
Your contribution helps develop content dedicated to awareness, well-being, and inner transformation. Even a small contribution can make a difference.
Thank you so much. 🙏
